1
Implementing Shapley Value Credit Assignment in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning from Scratch
lti-agent reinforcement learnin

2024-12-17 09:34:05

Introduction

Hello, today I'd like to discuss a fascinating topic in multi-agent reinforcement learning - Shapley Value credit assignment. As a Python programming instructor who frequently discusses this concept with students, I've noticed many find it confusing. So today, I'll guide you through understanding and implementing this algorithm step by step in an easy-to-understand way.

Concept

Have you ever encountered a situation where everyone in a team project contributed effort, but it was difficult to accurately assess each person's contribution? In multi-agent reinforcement learning, we face a similar challenge. When multiple agents complete tasks together, how do we fairly evaluate each agent's contribution?

This is the problem that Shapley Value aims to solve. Originating from game theory, it's a mathematical method for fair profit distribution. What I find most appealing about it is that it considers not only individual agent contributions but also the synergistic effects between agents.

Principle

Let me explain with a simple example. Suppose two robots A and B are carrying a box together: - A working alone can lift 2kg - B working alone can lift 3kg - A and B together can lift 7kg

You'll notice that 7kg is greater than 2kg + 3kg = 5kg; this extra 2kg is the benefit from synergy. So how do we fairly distribute the "credit" for this 7kg?

Shapley Value calculation considers all possible combinations. For each agent, we calculate their marginal contributions when joining different teams and take the average. This distribution method satisfies efficiency (sum equals team benefit) and fairness (considers all possible combination orders).

Code Implementation

Let's implement this algorithm step by step. First, here's the basic complete calculation version:

import itertools
from collections import defaultdict

class ShapleyValueCalculator:
    def __init__(self):
        self.contributions = defaultdict(float)

    def add_contribution(self, agents, value):
        """Record contribution value for agent combinations"""
        self.contributions[tuple(sorted(agents))] = value

    def calculate_marginal(self, subset, agent):
        """Calculate marginal contribution of an agent to a specific subset"""
        with_agent = tuple(sorted(list(subset) + [agent]))
        without_agent = tuple(sorted(subset))
        return self.contributions[with_agent] - self.contributions[without_agent]

    def calculate_shapley_values(self, num_agents):
        """Calculate Shapley Values for all agents"""
        shapley_values = [0] * num_agents
        agent_range = range(num_agents)

        # Iterate through all possible permutations
        all_permutations = list(itertools.permutations(agent_range))
        permutation_count = len(all_permutations)

        for perm in all_permutations:
            for i, agent in enumerate(perm):
                # Calculate marginal contribution to previous subset
                subset = list(perm[:i])
                marginal = self.calculate_marginal(subset, agent)
                shapley_values[agent] += marginal / permutation_count

        return shapley_values


calculator = ShapleyValueCalculator()
calculator.add_contribution((), 0)        # empty set
calculator.add_contribution((0,), 2)      # only A
calculator.add_contribution((1,), 3)      # only B
calculator.add_contribution((0, 1), 7)    # A and B together

values = calculator.calculate_shapley_values(2)
print(f"Agents' Shapley Values: {values}")

While this implementation is intuitive, computational complexity grows exponentially with the number of agents. For large-scale systems, we need to use approximation algorithms:

import random

class ApproximateShapleyCalculator:
    def __init__(self, contributions):
        self.contributions = contributions

    def approximate_shapley_values(self, num_agents, num_samples=1000):
        """Approximate Shapley Values using Monte Carlo sampling"""
        shapley_values = [0] * num_agents

        for _ in range(num_samples):
            # Randomly generate agent permutation order
            permutation = random.sample(range(num_agents), num_agents)

            for i, agent in enumerate(permutation):
                # Calculate marginal contribution of current agent
                subset = set(permutation[:i])
                subset_with_agent = subset | {agent}

                marginal = (self.contributions.get(tuple(sorted(subset_with_agent)), 0) - 
                          self.contributions.get(tuple(sorted(subset)), 0))

                shapley_values[agent] += marginal / num_samples

        return shapley_values


contributions = {
    (): 0,
    (0,): 2,
    (1,): 3,
    (0, 1): 7
}

calculator = ApproximateShapleyCalculator(contributions)
approx_values = calculator.approximate_shapley_values(2, num_samples=10000)
print(f"Approximated Shapley Values: {approx_values}")

Performance Optimization

In practical applications, I've found these optimization techniques particularly effective:

  1. Cache intermediate results: For repeatedly occurring subset combinations, we can cache their contribution values to avoid redundant calculations.

  2. Parallel computation: Monte Carlo sampling method naturally suits parallelization, we can use multiprocessing to speed up calculations:

from multiprocessing import Pool
import numpy as np

def parallel_shapley_calculation(args):
    contributions, num_agents, batch_size = args
    local_values = np.zeros(num_agents)

    for _ in range(batch_size):
        permutation = np.random.permutation(num_agents)
        for i, agent in enumerate(permutation):
            subset = set(permutation[:i])
            subset_with_agent = subset | {agent}

            marginal = (contributions.get(tuple(sorted(subset_with_agent)), 0) - 
                       contributions.get(tuple(sorted(subset)), 0))

            local_values[agent] += marginal / batch_size

    return local_values

class ParallelShapleyCalculator:
    def __init__(self, contributions):
        self.contributions = contributions

    def calculate(self, num_agents, num_samples=10000, num_processes=4):
        batch_size = num_samples // num_processes
        args = [(self.contributions, num_agents, batch_size)] * num_processes

        with Pool(num_processes) as pool:
            results = pool.map(parallel_shapley_calculation, args)

        return np.mean(results, axis=0)

Practical Application

A common issue I encounter in real projects is: how to handle dynamically changing contribution values? For instance, in robot collaborative carrying scenarios, contributions might differ at each time step. We can maintain a contribution history within a time window:

class DynamicShapleyTracker:
    def __init__(self, window_size=100):
        self.window_size = window_size
        self.contribution_history = []
        self.calculator = ApproximateShapleyCalculator({})

    def update(self, timestep_contributions):
        """Update contribution history"""
        self.contribution_history.append(timestep_contributions)
        if len(self.contribution_history) > self.window_size:
            self.contribution_history.pop(0)

    def get_current_values(self, num_agents):
        """Calculate Shapley Values for current time window"""
        # Aggregate historical contributions
        aggregated_contributions = {}
        for contributions in self.contribution_history:
            for agents, value in contributions.items():
                if agents in aggregated_contributions:
                    aggregated_contributions[agents] += value
                else:
                    aggregated_contributions[agents] = value

        self.calculator.contributions = aggregated_contributions
        return self.calculator.approximate_shapley_values(num_agents)

Summary

Through today's sharing, we've deeply understood Shapley Value application in multi-agent reinforcement learning. From basic concepts to specific implementation, from simple scenarios to complex optimization, we've seen this algorithm's power and flexibility.

Do you think this credit assignment method is reasonable? Have you encountered similar problems in your projects? Feel free to share your thoughts and experiences in the comments.

By the way, if you want to study this topic in depth, I suggest you: 1. Try implementing different approximation algorithms 2. Test performance in larger-scale agent systems 3. Explore how to apply this method to your own projects

Remember, even perfect theory needs constant adjustment and optimization in practice. Let's improve our technical capabilities together through practical experience.

Recommended